The Bombay High Court has sought an explanation from the Cine and Television Artistes Association (CINTAA) over its decision to hold elections and announce the results despite earlier court directions, as per a report by Times Now. The development follows a contempt petition filed by the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE), which has accused the association of disregarding judicial orders.

On October 22, Justice Aarti Sathe issued a show cause notice to CINTAA, stating that the material placed before the court indicated a prima facie case of wilful disobedience and breach of undertaking. The court has also restrained the association from implementing the outcome of the elections held on October 20, 2026.

FWICE’s petition alleges that CINTAA failed to comply with directions issued by the Bombay High Court on September 11 and October 19. The earlier orders required the parties involved in the dispute to refrain from taking further steps that could affect the court’s directions while a Notice of Motion remained pending before the trial court.

According to the petition, CINTAA went ahead with its election process and declared the results despite these restrictions. FWICE has therefore approached the High Court seeking action over the alleged non-compliance. The federation was represented by Advocates Saveena Bedi Sachar and Ashok Shetty.

The show cause notice, issued under Rule 9(1) of the Contempt of Courts (Bombay High Court Rules, 1994), requires CINTAA to explain why proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, should not be initiated against it. The allegations concern the purported disregard of the previous orders and/or a wilful breach of the undertaking given before the court.

The High Court’s direction means CINTAA cannot act on the October 20 election results or give effect to them while the restraint remains in place. The notice represents an opportunity for the association to respond to the allegations; the court has not yet made a final determination on the contempt petition.

The matter is scheduled to come up before the Bombay High Court again on November 18, 2026.

Also Read: Poonam Dhillon hits back at CINTAA members after mass resignations: “I’m shocked by their allegations”

With more opportunities emerging for female-led films, conversations around gender parity, pay disparity and the commercial potential of women-centric stories continue to be a part of the entertainment industry. Actress Kriti Sanon recently shared her views on the changing landscape, highlighting the role of audiences in encouraging filmmakers to invest in stories led by women.

Kriti, who is reportedly set to headline a large-scale horror film backed by Maddock Films, also spoke about the difference in remuneration between male and female actors. While she acknowledged the growing number of substantial roles being written for women, she noted that pay parity remains an area that needs attention.

Talking about the rise of female-driven projects, the actress said, “With OTT and so many other platforms coming in, and also a lot of writers writing meaty parts for women, which is amazing, because now it's not just about male-driven films. There are many female-driven films that are also happening. Women are also opting for meaty parts. But of course, there is a lot of difference in the pay and the fee, which still needs to change. But it is all a mathematical calculation of what the return is going to be in theatres, what the platforms pay for certain films and certain actors.”

She added, “But I would actually like to say, I'm doing a film that is on my shoulders, a solo lead next. And I actually want the audiences to make it make as much money as it would if it had a male actor. Make it a blockbuster, and things will change. I feel it's not just about the industry. It's actually a calculated thing where how much you invest and how much you're getting is dependent on that. And actually, I feel the audiences need to make that difference also, you know, by watching a film regardless of the gender. So when that happens, and a film that's on a female's shoulders opens to big numbers, things will change.”

Through her remarks, Kriti emphasised that the success of female-led films at the box office could influence the industry's approach to casting, budgets and remuneration. She pointed out that the financial returns associated with a film play a role in determining how much producers invest in a project and how actors are paid.

The actress also called on audiences to support films based on their content rather than the gender of the lead actor. According to her, when a woman-led film achieves box-office numbers comparable to those of a male-led project, it could encourage the industry to explore more such ventures.

Kriti's next solo-led film is reportedly a large-scale horror project with Maddock Films. While further details about the project have not been confirmed in the information provided, her comments have brought attention to the commercial expectations surrounding female-led theatrical releases and the importance of audience participation in driving change.

Also Read : Kriti Sanon’s latest photo dump features dubbing studio glimpse, Pani Puri, Navratri celebration and more!

Anil Kapoor revisited his cherished memories of late actor and filmmaker Satish Kaushik on an upcoming episode of India Ke Top 1% – The Anil Kapoor Show. A contestant named Gagan, whose appearance reminded people of Satish, prompted the host to recall his long-standing friendship with the actor and the bond they shared beyond their professional association.

During the interaction, Gagan told Anil that people often compared him to Satish Kaushik. He also recalled meeting the late actor while shooting in Delhi for the television show Sumit Sambhal Lega. The conversation led Anil to reflect on the closeness they shared and the many memories they had created together.

Speaking about their relationship, Anil said, “My bond with him, I cannot explain. Even if this shoot were 70 minutes long, it would not be enough to tell his stories. He used to tell me, ‘Tera talent lajawab hai (Your talent is unmatched).’”

Anil also recalled that he affectionately called Satish ‘Danny DeVito’. The two shared a fondness for the film Twins and had often imagined playing twin brothers in a film of their own. Explaining why he felt such a deep connection with Satish, Anil said, “Agar mera koi judwa bhai ban sakta hai, toh woh sirf Satish tha, kyunki usko mere baare mein har cheez pata thi mera gussa, meri khushi, har cheez (If I could have a twin brother, it could only have been Satish, because he knew everything about me—my anger, my happiness, everything). He knew me so well.”

The exchange also featured a light-hearted tribute to Satish’s comic legacy. Anil and Gagan recreated one of the late actor’s memorable dialogues on stage: “Mera naam hai Calendar, main chala kitchen ke andar (My name is Calendar, I am going inside the kitchen)!” Appreciating the contestant’s gesture, Anil told him, “Aapne mera dil jeet liya hai (You have won my heart).”

Anil then added a humorous suggestion for the audience, saying that if anyone had the money to make a film inspired by Twins, they should cast him and Gagan as twin brothers. The moment brought humour to an otherwise emotional conversation about his friend.

Satish Kaushik, who worked as an actor, director and screenwriter, shared a long association with Anil Kapoor. Their friendship and collaborations made them familiar figures in Hindi cinema, and Anil’s recollections offered a glimpse into the personal bond behind that association.

India Ke Top 1% – The Anil Kapoor Show airs on Star Plus every Saturday and Sunday at 8 PM and is also available to stream on JioHotstar.

Also Read: Anil Kapoor reveals Sonam Kapoor bought her own flat with her savings after Saawariya break: “Mujhe kharidne ki zaroorat hi nahi padi”

Shahid Kapoor and Kareena Kapoor Khan sparked nostalgia among fans after sharing a warm hug at the recent International Indian Film Academy (IIFA) press conference in Mumbai. The two actors, who were among Bollywood’s most widely discussed couples in the early 2000s, exchanged smiles and pleasantries at the event, with videos of their interaction subsequently circulating on social media.

The moment unfolded as Kareena stepped down from the stage, where she had been sharing the spotlight with Salman Khan and other attendees. Shahid, who was standing nearby, caught her attention, and the two greeted each other with a hug before briefly exchanging pleasantries. Their cordial interaction quickly caught the attention of fans, many of whom associated the reunion with their popular on-screen pairing in Jab We Met.

Both actors made distinct fashion choices for the press conference. Kareena arrived in an all-black ensemble featuring a top and a tailored skirt, while Shahid opted for an all-white silhouette.

View this post on Instagram

  A post shared by Bollywood Hungama🎥 (@realbollywoodhungama)

This is not the first time their friendly interactions at an IIFA event have generated interest online. In early 2025, the actors also exchanged greetings at an IIFA press event in Jaipur. Responding to the attention their interaction received at the time, Shahid had said that it was nice if people felt happy seeing them together, while adding that they often crossed paths in everyday life.

Shahid and Kareena’s relationship was widely followed during the early 2000s, when they also appeared together in films such as Fida (2004), 36 China Town (2006) and Chup Chup Ke (2006). Their most celebrated collaboration remains Imtiaz Ali’s Jab We Met (2007), in which they played Aditya and Geet. The film went on to become a popular romantic drama, and their on-screen chemistry continues to be remembered by audiences.

The actors later appeared in Milenge Milenge, which was released in 2010, and were also part of the ensemble cast of Udta Punjab (2016), although they did not share screen time in the latter film.

Both have since moved on in their personal lives. Shahid is married to Mira Rajput, while Kareena is married to Saif Ali Khan. Their latest interaction at the IIFA press conference offered a glimpse of their cordial equation at an industry event, bringing renewed attention to a pairing that remains familiar to Hindi film audiences.

The press conference was held ahead of the upcoming IIFA awards event in Abu Dhabi.

Also Read: Photos: Salman Khan, Shahid Kapoor, Varun Dhawan, Rashmika Mandanna, Kareena Kapoor Khan and others snapped at IIFA Digital Awards press conference

Days after a shooting incident of Tiger Shroff in Mumbai’s Juhu neighbourhood, his team has shared a video on their official social media handle showing the injuries he sustained during the attack. The footage features visible cuts, abrasions and bruises, offering a glimpse of the physical impact of the incident. The actor reportedly escaped direct bullet injuries when unidentified assailants opened fire at his vehicle.

According to the details shared, the injuries were sustained amid the chaos as bullets struck the vehicle and shattered glass. The video shows marks on Tiger’s arms and back. The social media post comes as the investigation into the firing continues, with multiple agencies working to establish the circumstances surrounding the attack and identify everyone allegedly involved.

The shooting took place at around 7 pm on Sunday, October 18, outside a sports facility in Juhu. According to reports, motorcycle-borne assailants opened fire at Tiger’s car before fleeing the scene. The two-wheeler was reportedly abandoned near Andheri West railway station.

Tiger Shroff reportedly avoided fatal injuries, while his driver, Firdous, and a passer-by sustained injuries and were taken to Nanavati Hospital. The driver is said to remain under medical observation as he recovers.

View this post on Instagram

  A post shared by Team Tiger Shroff (@teamtigershroff)

Following the incident, an unverified social media claim linked the attack to the Lawrence Bishnoi syndicate. However, the allegation has not been independently established, and investigators are continuing to examine the possible motive and the wider circumstances of the firing.

The Mumbai Crime Branch, working with other law enforcement agencies, has carried out arrests across several states in connection with the case. According to the details provided, the total number of people arrested had reached 10 by October 23.

Three key suspects, identified as Rehan Ansari, Phool Singh and Ritik Mahtoo, were reportedly apprehended in Kota, Rajasthan, while allegedly attempting to flee towards the Nepal border. They were subsequently brought to Mumbai. On October 21, a Mumbai court reportedly remanded the three suspects to police custody until October 31.

Investigators are also examining an alleged interstate weapons network and possible links between those accused of carrying out the attack and individuals suspected of assisting them. Further inquiries are reportedly focused on the planning of the incident, the movement of weapons and the possibility of a wider conspiracy.

The investigation has also prompted renewed scrutiny of security arrangements for prominent Bollywood personalities. Tiger’s representatives have expressed appreciation for the police response and urged people to refrain from circulating unverified information while the investigation remains ongoing.

Also Read: Tiger Shroff resumes shooting of Lag Jaa Gale two days after firing incident: Report

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) has raised objections to the promotional content of Sunny Deol’s upcoming crime drama Suryaa: Ant Se Aarambh Tak, expressing concern over its portrayal of the medical profession. In a formal communication, the association questioned whether the film’s depiction of alleged corruption and violence against healthcare workers could contribute to negative perceptions of doctors and hospital personnel.

The IMA has outlined four key areas of concern, including the generalisation of alleged misconduct across the medical fraternity, the depiction of physical assaults on healthcare workers, the safety of medical personnel and the potential impact on doctor-patient trust.

In its letter, the association cautioned against portraying individual instances of wrongdoing in a manner that could reflect on the wider medical community. It stated, "The portrayal risks creating the impression that corruption, unethical practices, and alleged corruption in medical fraternity. While individual misconduct must be investigated and punished, the actions of a few must not be used to tarnish the reputation of countless honest and dedicated doctors."

The organisation also expressed concern over scenes involving physical confrontations in medical facilities, particularly if such actions are presented as justified. The IMA stated, "Scenes depicting physical assaults on doctors, nursing staff, and hospital personnel, particularly when presented as heroic or justified acts, risk normalising violence against those committed to saving lives."

Highlighting the safety concerns faced by healthcare workers, the association further said, "Doctors and healthcare personnel already face serious safety challenges in hospitals. Content that appears to glorify attacks on medical professionals may encourage hostility and further endanger those providing essential healthcare services."

The IMA also flagged the possible impact of such portrayals on public confidence in medical professionals, stating, "Such portrayals may foster unwarranted mistrust and hostility towards doctors, weakening the mutual trust and cooperation essential for effective treatment and healthcare delivery."

While making its objections known, the association clarified that it does not support unethical medical practices and that individual cases of misconduct should be addressed through statutory and disciplinary mechanisms. It argued that such instances should not lead to broad portrayals that could affect the reputation of the profession or discourage aspiring medical students.

As part of its appeal, the IMA requested an impartial review of the film’s content and asked for appropriate corrective measures to address its concerns. It also called on the relevant authorities to consider further action, stating, "In view of these concerns, we respectfully request... [an] impartial review of the film's content and its portrayal of the medical profession; seek appropriate corrective measures from the filmmakers to address the generalisation of alleged misconduct and the depiction of violence against healthcare workers; [and] consider a ban or other appropriate action if justified under applicable law."

Directed by M. Padmakumar in his Hindi directorial debut, Suryaa: Ant Se Aarambh Tak is an official remake of the 2018 Malayalam crime thriller Joseph. The film stars Sunny Deol as a retired police officer who investigates disturbing revelations involving medical malpractice and systemic corruption following a personal tragedy. The supporting cast includes Ravi Kishan, Pragya Jaiswal, Manish Wadhwa and Jisshu Sengupta.

Produced by Kamal Mukut, the film is scheduled to release theatrically on November 20, 2026. The IMA’s objections have brought attention to the film’s portrayal of healthcare workers ahead of its planned release.

Also Read: On Sunny Deol’s birthday, Suryaa: Ant Se Aarambh Tak teaser unleashes his fight against corruption within the medical system; watch

Veteran actor Manoj Bajpayee has expressed concern over the firing incident targeting Tiger Shroff’s car in Mumbai’s Juhu neighbourhood, describing the situation as frightening and emphasising the need for a thorough investigation. Speaking to news agency ANI, Bajpayee said he was relieved that the Baaghi actor had escaped unharmed and hoped the authorities would take decisive action.

Reacting to the incident, Bajpayee said, “I don't see a gang war, but shots are being fired from who knows where, and that's really scary. Secondly, it's sad what happened to Tiger, but the best and happiest part is that he's safe, and his driver is also recovering slowly. Anyway, we aren't law and order experts or anything. From what I've heard in the news, the investigation is ongoing. The alleged suspects have been brought to Mumbai, and they've been arrested. I just hope the investigation wraps up as soon as possible and that an example is set so that next time, anyone will think twice before doing something like this.”

The incident took place on the evening of Sunday, October 18, when unidentified assailants allegedly opened fire at Tiger Shroff’s car in Juhu before fleeing on a motorcycle. The actor escaped without gunshot injuries, while his driver, Firdous, and a bystander sustained injuries and were taken to Nanavati Hospital for treatment. The driver is reportedly recovering.

The Mumbai Crime Branch’s Anti-Extortion Cell is leading the investigation. According to reports, the suspected shooters fled Mumbai through Gujarat and Rajasthan and were intercepted in Kota before being brought back to the city. On October 21, a court remanded three accused to police custody until October 31 as investigators continued questioning them.

The probe has also widened beyond the alleged shooters. The Delhi Police Special Cell has reportedly arrested individuals suspected of being part of an interstate weapons supply network linked to the case. Investigators are examining possible connections to an overseas-based syndicate allegedly affiliated with the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. An online claim of responsibility has also been reported, although the alleged links and motive remain subject to investigation.

Meanwhile, reports that the accused may have conducted reconnaissance near other prominent residences have prompted precautionary security measures, including heightened security around Salman Khan’s Galaxy Apartments in Bandra.

Tiger Shroff’s team has urged the public and media to avoid speculation while the investigation continues. The authorities are expected to establish the circumstances surrounding the attack and determine whether a wider conspiracy was involved.

Also Read: Tiger Shroff’s team issues statement after firing in Juhu, says actor made “no statements” about incident